Forensic transaction review
Deep reconstruction of selected payment trails, journal entries, and bank movements over an agreed period, ending in a findings letter and closed briefing.
Read scope →Hong Kong · Forensic audit practice
Appnet Bridge
We reconstruct disputed payment trails, test ledger integrity, and deliver findings letters that counsel and audit committees can rely on.
What we examine
When payments, transfers, or journal entries do not add up, we reconstruct the trail from source documents to bank records and report what the numbers actually show.
Ledger integrity assessment
A shorter assessment of posting discipline, cut-off, and journal control — useful before a full forensic review or after a system migration.
Read scope →
Dispute support documentation
Organising chronologies, exhibits, and workpaper packs so instructing solicitors can present contested transactions clearly.
Read scope →From intake to findings letter
Every forensic transaction review follows a disciplined sequence so counsel and finance leadership know what to expect at each stage.
Scope and hold
We agree the periods, entities, and transaction types under review, then preserve relevant ledgers, bank statements, and supporting vouchers.
Trace and test
Each material movement is traced to supporting evidence. Gaps, circular flows, and unusual counterparties are flagged for deeper inspection.
Findings and briefing
You receive a written findings letter, workpaper references, and a closed briefing for the board, audit committee, or instructing solicitors.
From clients who sat through the review
Specific feedback from finance directors and counsel who instructed Appnet Bridge on disputed books and payment trails.
“They spent three weeks on our vendor payment file and found two circular routes we had missed in the first internal check. The findings letter was dense but usable in the board pack without rewriting.”Mei Ling Cheung — Finance director, Central trading group
“The kickoff felt slower than I wanted — they insisted on a document hold before opening the ledger. Looking back, that discipline kept the review from being challenged later.”Jonathan Hale — External counsel, commercial dispute
Need a second pair of eyes on the books?
Tell us the period, entities, and what looks irregular. We respond within two business days with a proposed scope and fee basis.
Start an enquiry